| IMO spearheads efforts to reduce shipping’s GHG emissions
International Maritime Organisation
Whether we like it or not, there is no avoiding the fact that the
modern world is utterly dependent on motorised transport systems
that run largely on fossil fuels. Moreover, it is also inescapable that
the use of fossil fuels carries an environmental burden. An engine
burning fossil fuel will emit a quantity of greenhouse gases (GHGs),
principally carbon dioxide (CO2), and these emissions are now
widely accepted as being significant contributory factors towards
global warming and climate change.
Carbon emissions and fuel efficiency are directly linked. Less fuel
consumption means smaller GHG emissions. Shipowners have always
sought to minimise their fuel costs for commercial reasons, as fuel
represents a significant proportion of their total voyage costs. Their
methods have included using the shortest, safest and, therefore, most
environmentally-sound routes between ports; economies of scale
(the largest container ships being built now hold approximately
12,000 containers as opposed to 5,000 in 1990); and optimisation of
hull design, engine technology and propeller design.

Improved design and efficiency
In recent decades, improved hydrodynamics in vessel hull design have
brought reductions of between 2 and 4% in fuel consumption. More
advanced propulsion systems and, in particular, propeller design have
realised similar reductions. Better engine efficiency has resulted in
even larger reductions. A new engine with the same power output
consumes about 10% less fuel than its predecessor installed ten years
ago. Of course, the long operational lifetimes of ships, on average
about 25 years, does mean that the emission benefits associated with
such new technology take a long time to achieve their full effect.
Since the adoption by IMO of air pollution regulations for
international shipping in 1997 (now under revision), which included a
ban on ozone-depleting substances, the Organization has engaged in
further discussion on ways to reduce emissions from ships. An IMO
study into GHG emissions from ships was undertaken and, in May
2000, the Organization decided to also prohibit the use of
perfluorocarbons (PFCs) onboard ships. PFCs have extremely long
atmospheric lifetimes (in excess of 5000 years) and possess high
global warming potential.
Since then, and in support of a 2003 IMO Assembly resolution –
A.963(23) on IMO Policies and Practices related to the Reduction of
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships – the Organization has been
actively engaged in the development of a GHG Indexing Scheme for
ships. Interim guidelines for this purpose were approved in July 2005
to establish a common approach for trials to enable shipowners to
evaluate the performance of their fleet with regard to CO2 emissions. As the amount of CO2 emitted from a ship is directly
related to the consumption of bunker fuel oil, CO2 indexing will also
provide useful information on a ship’s fuel efficiency.
It has already been observed from such trials that identical ships in
seemingly similar trades produce diverse results; the difference may result from different weather conditions or from operational
differences concerning the specific utilisation of individual ships
involved in the trials. Issues such as the length of time spent waiting
in port areas, the length of ballast voyages, whether the ship is fully
laden or not, can all make a difference.
As a result of IMO’s and the shipping industry’s efforts, a number of
areas have been identified in which there is considerable potential for
the further reduction of CO2 emissions from ships, such as
optimisation of hull shape, hull maintenance, propeller design and
maintenance, fuel choices, machinery monitoring, ship-routeing
considerations including speed reduction, and optimising vessel trim,
engine performance, propeller pitch and rudder angles.
Continual commitment to reductions
We continue to examine such options because it has been
recognised and agreed that climate change caused by GHG emissions
from burning fossil fuel is a steadily growing concern for most
countries, and that the threat from global warming is far too serious
to be ignored. Therefore, shipping, although already an
environmentally- friendly and fuel-efficient mode of transport, must
take further action and, in 2006, IMO adopted a work plan with
timetable for future work on GHG reduction. We also agreed that
the Organization should maintain its leading position in developing
GHG strategies and mechanisms for international shipping and
cooperate closely with other relevant UN bodies to avoid unilateral
action on a global, regional or national level.
Currently, we are engaged in a comprehensive review to assess the
wider impact of all the various options for reduction of air pollution
proposed in connection with the revision of MARPOL Annex VI, and
in a thorough updating of the 2000 IMO Greenhouse gas study.
In the Organization’s endeavours to achieve emission reductions, it is
important not only to remain focused on the desired goal, but also
to ensure that improvements in one area are not compromised by
negative impacts in others. It is, therefore, essential to take a holistic
and inclusive approach, to understand the “big picture” and to find
balanced and workable solutions that achieve a positive net effect for
the global environment.
These issues have to be tackled at the truly international level and,
for shipping, that can only mean through IMO, which is the
Specialized Agency of the United Nations with a specific mandate for
creating the international regulatory framework for the safety,
security and efficiency of international shipping and for the
protection of the marine environment from ships. It is unquestionably
the proper place for these matters to be resolved, both for reasons
of principle and for practical considerations.
What is often overlooked in any discussion about overall levels of
GHG emissions from shipping is that the total amount of shipping
activity is not governed by shipping itself, but by global demand for
shipborne trade. There is no doubt that shipping is a clean, green,
environmentally-friendly and very energy-efficient mode of transport.
Although, overall, it is only a small contributor to the total volume of
atmospheric emissions, nevertheless, significant reductions in harmful
emissions from ships and increases in fuel efficiency have been
achieved over recent years, and this work must and will continue to
be a high priority for all stakeholders.
That is why I was personally delighted that the IMO Council selected
our response to current environmental challenges to take centre
stage this year in the theme for World Maritime Day, and to be a
centrepiece in a host of other activities and initiatives, forming part
of a concerted action plan that we have been undertaking to educate
people, increase their awareness about the true, and deteriorating,
state of the planet, and help us all to become responsible citizens, in
its fullest sense.
W: www.imo.org |